netdev - Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Use NETDEV_TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 18:52:30 +0800
From:   Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To:     Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>, <mst@...hat.com>,
        <jasowang@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <hawk@...nel.org>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC:     <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Use NETDEV_TX_BUSY when has no buf to send

On 2023/3/9 15:49, Angus Chen wrote:
> Don't consume skb if virtqueue_add return -ENOSPC.

Is this fixing the same out of space problem caused by
xdp xmit as Xuan Zhuo is fixing, or it is fixing a different
case?

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230308071921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org/T/#mc4c5766a59fb8be988bb6a4dfa48f49e58df3ea6

> 
> Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fb5e68ed3ec2..4096ea3d2eb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1980,7 +1980,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  				 qnum, err);
>  		dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
>  		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);

Returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY will caused stack to requeue the skb
and send it again when space is available, but you have freed the skb here,
isn't this cause use-after-free problem?

> -		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +		return (err == -ENOSPC) ? NETDEV_TX_BUSY : NETDEV_TX_OK;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Don't wait up for transmitted skbs to be freed. */
>