[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY2PR06MB3424EE070926DE5D1B2D141985B59@TY2PR06MB3424.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 12:26:02 +0000
From: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC: "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] virtio_net: Use NETDEV_TX_BUSY when has no buf to send
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 6:53 PM
> To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>; mst@...hat.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com;
> kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; ast@...nel.org; daniel@...earbox.net;
> hawk@...nel.org; john.fastabend@...il.com
> Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; bpf@...r.kernel.org; Xuan Zhuo
> <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Use NETDEV_TX_BUSY when has no buf to send
>
> On 2023/3/9 15:49, Angus Chen wrote:
> > Don't consume skb if virtqueue_add return -ENOSPC.
>
> Is this fixing the same out of space problem caused by
> xdp xmit as Xuan Zhuo is fixing, or it is fixing a different
> case?
Yes, the same print info.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230308071921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.
> org/T/#mc4c5766a59fb8be988bb6a4dfa48f49e58df3ea6
>
En,I haven't noticed this patch before.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index fb5e68ed3ec2..4096ea3d2eb6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -1980,7 +1980,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct net_device *dev)
> > qnum, err);
> > dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> > dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>
> Returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY will caused stack to requeue the skb
> and send it again when space is available, but you have freed the skb here,
> isn't this cause use-after-free problem?
Yes,you are right, would be crash after I tested more times .I will drop it,thank you.
>
> > - return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > + return (err == -ENOSPC) ? NETDEV_TX_BUSY : NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > }
> >
> > /* Don't wait up for transmitted skbs to be freed. */
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists