netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2: remove deadcode in bnx2_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230309234104.79286da7@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 23:41:04 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@...il.com>
Cc:     Rasesh Mody <rmody@...vell.com>, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
        Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2: remove deadcode in bnx2_init_cpus()

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:33:46 +0300 Maxim Korotkov wrote:
>   Path with error handling was deleted in 57579f7629a3 ("bnx2: Use 
> request_firmware()"). This patch is needed to improving readability.
> Now checking the value of the return value is misleading when reading 
> the code.
> Do I need to add this argument to the patch description?

Yes please. 

> I also forgot to add mark Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky 
> <leonro@...dia.com> from the previous iteration

So this is not the first revision? Please add Leon's tag and an
appropriate vN. e.g. [PATCH net-next v2].

In general we don't encourage cleanup of this sort because the number
of int functions which always return 0 is rather large in the kernel,
but if you already got an ack from Leon we'll consider it, so please
adjust and repost.