[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBF/wr8HUg49gWZK@corigine.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:20:18 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] net: sunhme: Just restart
autonegotiation if we can't bring the link up
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 08:36:05PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> If we've tried regular autonegotiation and forcing the link mode, just
> restart autonegotiation instead of reinitializing the whole NIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
Hi Sean,
This patch looks fine to me, as do patches 3 - 4, which is as far as I have
got with my review.
I do, however, have a general question regarding most of the patches in this
series: to what extent have they been tested on HW?
And my follow-up question is: to what extent should we consider removing
support for hardware that isn't being tested and therefore has/will likely
have become broken break at some point? Quattro, the subject of a latter
patch in this series, seems to be a case in point.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists