[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBGSbzgL2fVvBYG5@Laptop-X1>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:39:59 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
Phil Sutter <psutter@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net/sched: act_api: add specific EXT_WARN_MSG
for tc action
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:45:32AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:58:02 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> > @@ -789,6 +789,7 @@ enum {
> > TCA_ROOT_FLAGS,
> > TCA_ROOT_COUNT,
> > TCA_ROOT_TIME_DELTA, /* in msecs */
> > + TCA_ACT_EXT_WARN_MSG,
>
> Not TCA_ROOT_EXT_... ?
> All other attrs in this set are called TCA_ROOT_x
Hmm, when we discussed this issue, Jamal suggested to use TCAA_EXT_WARN_MSG.
I expand it to TCA_ACT_EXT_WARN_MSG to correspond with the format of TCA_*.
But your suggest TCA_ROOT_EXT_ also makes sense. I'm OK to change it.
Jamal, what do you think?
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists