| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZBGTL9i9/rC6xSdQ@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:43:11 +0100
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: edward.cree@....com
Cc: linux-net-drivers@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
habetsm.xilinx@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] sfc: add code to register and unregister
encap matches
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:35:24PM +0000, edward.cree@....com wrote:
> From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
>
> Add a hashtable to detect duplicate and conflicting matches. If match
> is not a duplicate, call MAE functions to add/remove it from OR table.
> Calling code not added yet, so mark the new functions as unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h | 11 +++
> 2 files changed, 187 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
> index d683665a8d87..dc092403af12 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ static s64 efx_tc_flower_external_mport(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_rep *efv
> return mport;
> }
>
> +static const struct rhashtable_params efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params = {
> + .key_len = offsetof(struct efx_tc_encap_match, linkage),
> + .key_offset = 0,
> + .head_offset = offsetof(struct efx_tc_encap_match, linkage),
> +};
> +
> static const struct rhashtable_params efx_tc_match_action_ht_params = {
> .key_len = sizeof(unsigned long),
> .key_offset = offsetof(struct efx_tc_flow_rule, cookie),
> @@ -344,6 +350,157 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_parse_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +__always_unused
> +static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
> + struct efx_tc_match *match,
> + enum efx_encap_type type,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap, *old;
> + unsigned char ipv;
int? or even boolean is_ipv4
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* We require that the socket-defining fields (IP addrs and UDP dest
> + * port) are present and exact-match. Other fields are currently not
> + * allowed. This meets what OVS will ask for, and means that we don't
> + * need to handle difficult checks for overlapping matches as could
> + * come up if we allowed masks or varying sets of match fields.
> + */
> + if (match->mask.enc_dst_ip | match->mask.enc_src_ip) {
> + ipv = 4;
> + if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_dst_ip)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> + "Egress encap match is not exact on dst IP address");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> + if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_src_ip)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> + "Egress encap match is not exact on src IP address");
Do You mean that only exact match is supported?
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
> + if (!ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.enc_dst_ip6) ||
> + !ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.enc_src_ip6)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> + "Egress encap match on both IPv4 and IPv6, don't understand");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ipv = 6;
> + if (!efx_ipv6_addr_all_ones(&match->mask.enc_dst_ip6)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> + "Egress encap match is not exact on dst IP address");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> + if (!efx_ipv6_addr_all_ones(&match->mask.enc_src_ip6)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> + "Egress encap match is not exact on src IP address");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +#endif
> + }
> + if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_dport)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match is not exact on dst UDP port");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> + if (match->mask.enc_sport) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on src UDP port not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> + if (match->mask.enc_ip_tos) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP ToS not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> + if (match->mask.enc_ip_ttl) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP TTL not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + rc = efx_mae_check_encap_match_caps(efx, ipv, extack);
> + if (rc) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "MAE hw reports no support for IPv%d encap matches",
> + ipv);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + encap = kzalloc(sizeof(*encap), GFP_USER);
> + if (!encap)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + switch (ipv) {
> + case 4:
> + encap->src_ip = match->value.enc_src_ip;
> + encap->dst_ip = match->value.enc_dst_ip;
> + break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
> + case 6:
> + encap->src_ip6 = match->value.enc_src_ip6;
> + encap->dst_ip6 = match->value.enc_dst_ip6;
> + break;
> +#endif
> + default: /* can't happen */
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on bad IP version %d",
> + ipv);
> + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto fail_allocated;
I will rewrite it to if. You will get rid of this unreachable code.
> + }
> + encap->udp_dport = match->value.enc_dport;
> + encap->tun_type = type;
> + old = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht,
> + &encap->linkage,
> + efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
> + if (old) {
> + /* don't need our new entry */
> + kfree(encap);
> + if (old->tun_type != type) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
> + "Egress encap match with conflicting tun_type %u != %u",
> + old->tun_type, type);
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> + if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&old->ref))
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + /* existing entry found */
> + encap = old;
> + } else {
> + rc = efx_mae_register_encap_match(efx, encap);
> + if (rc) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to record egress encap match in HW");
> + goto fail_inserted;
> + }
> + refcount_set(&encap->ref, 1);
> + }
> + match->encap = encap;
> + return 0;
> +fail_inserted:
> + rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
> + efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
> +fail_allocated:
> + kfree(encap);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists