[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBIz7yxaeDOiV4xk@x130>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:09:03 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net 03/14] net/mlx5: Fix setting ec_function bit in MANAGE_PAGES
On 15 Mar 14:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 13:51:46 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> >> +static u32 get_ec_function(u32 function)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return function >> 16;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static u32 get_func_id(u32 function)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return function & 0xffff;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >Some code in this file is mlx5 'namespaced', some is not. It may be a
>> >little easier to follow the code knowing explicitly whether it is driver
>> >vs core code, just something to consider.
>>
>> For static local file functions we prefer to avoid mlx5 perfix.
>
>FWIW the lack of consistent namespacing does make mlx5 code harder
>for me to read, so it's definitely something to reconsider long term.
When looking from a larger scope of multiple drivers and stack, yes it
makes total sense.
Ack, will enforce adding mlx5 prefix to static functions as well..
Let me know if you want me to fix this series for the time being,
I see another comment from leon on a blank line in one of the commit
messages.
I can handle both and post v2 at the same time.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists