[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR18MB240835B708FA3A5B489656738DBF9@BYAPR18MB2408.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:35:40 +0000
From: Yan Jiang <Yan.Jiang@...visolutions.com>
To: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ioctl SIOCSHWTSTAMP failed on a vlan interface within non-default
network namespace
Hi all,
I'd like to report an issue, which I suspect it's related to kernel network namespace handling.
It's my first report so please bear with me if I missed something. Feel free to ask for more information please.
What's the issue:
Ptp4l works perfectly on a VLAN interface in default network namespace. But it doesn't work if the VLAN interface is in non-default network namespace: ioctl(fd, SIOCSHWTSTAMP, &ifreq) failed due to error "Operation not supported".
"ethtool -T" shows that the VLAN interface has all required capabilities. And ptp4l works fine on the base interface in that network namespace.
How to reproduce this issue:
# create a new network namespace for test purpose
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns add mytest
# move eno4 into the namespace
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip link set eno4 netns mytest
# add vlan interface and turn interfaces up
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ifconfig eno4 up
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ip link add link eno4 name eno4.4000 type vlan id 4000
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ifconfig eno4.4000 up
# ptp4l runs ok on eno4
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ptp4l -2 -m -i eno4
ptp4l[1670814.457]: selected /dev/ptp1 as PTP clock
ptp4l[1670814.491]: port 1: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INIT_COMPLETE
ptp4l[1670814.492]: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INIT_COMPLETE
#ptp4l cannot run on eno4.4000
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ptp4l -2 -m -i eno4.4000
ptp4l[1670819.969]: selected /dev/ptp1 as PTP clock
ptp4l[1670820.003]: driver rejected most general HWTSTAMP filter
ptp4l[1670820.003]: ioctl SIOCSHWTSTAMP failed: Operation not supported
ptp4l[1670820.039]: port 1: INITIALIZING to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED)
ptp4l[1670820.039]: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INIT_COMPLETE
#ethtool -T shows that eno4.4000 has same capability as eno4:
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ethtool -T eno4.4000
Time stamping parameters for eno4.4000:
Capabilities:
hardware-transmit (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE)
software-transmit (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE)
hardware-receive (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE)
software-receive (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)
software-system-clock (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
hardware-raw-clock (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
PTP Hardware Clock: 1
Hardware Transmit Timestamp Modes:
off (HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF)
on (HWTSTAMP_TX_ON)
Hardware Receive Filter Modes:
none (HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE)
ptpv1-l4-event (HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT)
ptpv2-l4-event (HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_EVENT)
ptpv2-l2-event (HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT)
#OS/kernel version
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# uname -a
Linux viavi-PowerEdge-R740 5.15.0-60-generic #66~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 25 09:41:30 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
#driver info:
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ethtool -i eno4
driver: tg3
version: 5.15.0-60-generic
firmware-version: FFV21.40.21 bc 5720-v1.39
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info: 0000:01:00.1
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: yes
supports-priv-flags: no
root@...vi-PowerEdge-R740:~# ip netns exec mytest ethtool -i eno4.4000
driver: 802.1Q VLAN Support
version: 1.8
firmware-version: N/A
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info:
supports-statistics: no
supports-test: no
supports-eeprom-access: no
supports-register-dump: no
supports-priv-flags: no
#(PS: can reproduce same issue with a Mellanox NIC, so I guess it's not caused by a specific NIC model)
Could you kindly take a look at this and see if this is a kernel issue? This blocks linuxptp running in cloud environment, if VLAN is required.
Hope to get feedback from you soon, thanks!
/Yan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists