[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40o4o5s6-5oo6-nn03-r257-24po258nq0nq@syhkavp.arg>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 16:53:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com,
matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
Raghavendra Khadatare <raghavendrax.anand.khadatare@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ptp: add ToD device driver for Intel FPGA cards
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:43:30AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > Alternatively the above commit can be reverted if no one else
> > cares. I personally gave up on the idea of a slimmed down Linux kernel a
> > while ago.
>
> Does this mean I can restore the posix clocks back into the core
> unconditionally?
This only means _I_ no longer care. I'm not speaking for others (e.g.
OpenWRT or the like) who might still rely on splitting it out.
Maybe Andy wants to "fix" it?
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists