[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBmq8cW36e8pRZ+s@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:02:41 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com,
matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
Raghavendra Khadatare <raghavendrax.anand.khadatare@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ptp: add ToD device driver for Intel FPGA cards
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:53:07PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Richard Cochran wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:43:30AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >
> > > Alternatively the above commit can be reverted if no one else
> > > cares. I personally gave up on the idea of a slimmed down Linux kernel a
> > > while ago.
> >
> > Does this mean I can restore the posix clocks back into the core
> > unconditionally?
>
> This only means _I_ no longer care. I'm not speaking for others (e.g.
> OpenWRT or the like) who might still rely on splitting it out.
> Maybe Andy wants to "fix" it?
I would be a good choice, if I have an access to the hardware at hand to test.
That said, I think Richard himself can try to finish that feature (optional PTP)
and on my side I can help with reviewing the code (just Cc me when needed).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists