lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:18:29 +0100
From:   Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add code for
 offloading flows from wlan devices

On 22.03.23 15:04, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> WED version 2 (on MT7986 and later) can offload flows originating from wireless
>> devices. In order to make that work, ndo_setup_tc needs to be implemented on
>> the netdevs. This adds the required code to offload flows coming in from WED,
>> while keeping track of the incoming wed index used for selecting the correct
>> PPE device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
> 
> Hi Felix,
> 
> A few nits from my side.
> 
> First, please reformat the patch description to have a maximum of 75 characters
> per line, as suggested by checkpatch.
Will do

>> @@ -512,25 +514,15 @@ mtk_flow_offload_stats(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f)
>>  
>>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(mtk_flow_offload_mutex);
>>  
>> -static int
>> -mtk_eth_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data, void *cb_priv)
>> +int mtk_flow_offload_cmd(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *cls,
>> +			 int ppe_index)
>>  {
>> -	struct flow_cls_offload *cls = type_data;
>> -	struct net_device *dev = cb_priv;
>> -	struct mtk_mac *mac = netdev_priv(dev);
>> -	struct mtk_eth *eth = mac->hw;
>>  	int err;
>>  
>> -	if (!tc_can_offload(dev))
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -
>> -	if (type != TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER)
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -
>>  	mutex_lock(&mtk_flow_offload_mutex);
>>  	switch (cls->command) {
>>  	case FLOW_CLS_REPLACE:
>> -		err = mtk_flow_offload_replace(eth, cls);
>> +		err = mtk_flow_offload_replace(eth, cls, ppe_index);
>>  		break;
>>  	case FLOW_CLS_DESTROY:
>>  		err = mtk_flow_offload_destroy(eth, cls);
>> @@ -547,6 +539,23 @@ mtk_eth_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data, void *cb_pri
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int
>> +mtk_eth_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data, void *cb_priv)
>> +{
>> +	struct flow_cls_offload *cls = type_data;
>> +	struct net_device *dev = cb_priv;
>> +	struct mtk_mac *mac = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +	struct mtk_eth *eth = mac->hw;
> 
> Reverse xmas tree - longest line to shortest -
> for local variable declarations please.
Will do.

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c
>> index 95d890870984..30fe1281d2d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c
> 
> ...
> 
>> @@ -1745,6 +1752,102 @@ void mtk_wed_flow_remove(int index)
>>  	mutex_unlock(&hw_lock);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int
>> +mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data, void *cb_priv)
>> +{
>> +	struct mtk_wed_flow_block_priv *priv = cb_priv;
>> +	struct flow_cls_offload *cls = type_data;
>> +	struct mtk_wed_hw *hw = priv->hw;
>> +
>> +	if (!tc_can_offload(priv->dev))
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	if (type != TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	return mtk_flow_offload_cmd(hw->eth, cls, hw->index);
> 
> This seems very similar to mtk_eth_setup_tc_block_cb().
> Can further consolidation be considered?
It's similar, but using different data structures and pointer chains. 
Consolidation does not make sense here.

>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +mtk_wed_setup_tc_block(struct mtk_wed_hw *hw, struct net_device *dev,
>> +		       struct flow_block_offload *f)
>> +{
>> +	struct mtk_wed_flow_block_priv *priv;
>> +	static LIST_HEAD(block_cb_list);
>> +	struct flow_block_cb *block_cb;
>> +	struct mtk_eth *eth = hw->eth;
>> +	bool register_block = false;
>> +	flow_setup_cb_t *cb;
>> +
>> +	if (!eth->soc->offload_version)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	if (f->binder_type != FLOW_BLOCK_BINDER_TYPE_CLSACT_INGRESS)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	cb = mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb;
>> +	f->driver_block_list = &block_cb_list;
>> +
>> +	switch (f->command) {
>> +	case FLOW_BLOCK_BIND:
>> +		block_cb = flow_block_cb_lookup(f->block, cb, dev);
>> +		if (!block_cb) {
> 
> I wonder if this could be written more idiomatically as:
> 
> 		if (block_cb) {
> 			flow_block_cb_incref(block_cb);
> 			return 0;
> 		}
> 
> 		priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
flow_block_cb_incref needs to be called for the newly allocated flow 
block cb as well. I was following the same pattern that several
>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
> 
> ...
> 
>> @@ -237,6 +240,8 @@ mtk_wed_get_rx_capa(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
>>  	(_dev)->ops->msg_update(_dev, _id, _msg, _len)
>>  #define mtk_wed_device_stop(_dev) (_dev)->ops->stop(_dev)
>>  #define mtk_wed_device_dma_reset(_dev) (_dev)->ops->reset_dma(_dev)
>> +#define mtk_wed_device_setup_tc(_dev, _netdev, _type, _type_data) \
>> +	(_dev)->ops->setup_tc(_dev, _netdev, _type, _type_data)
> 
> nit: checkpatch says:
> 
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h:243: ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> +#define mtk_wed_device_setup_tc(_dev, _netdev, _type, _type_data) \
> +	(_dev)->ops->setup_tc(_dev, _netdev, _type, _type_data)
> 
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h:243: CHECK: Macro argument reuse '_dev' - possible side-effects?
> +#define mtk_wed_device_setup_tc(_dev, _netdev, _type, _type_data) \
> +	(_dev)->ops->setup_tc(_dev, _netdev, _type, _type_data)
In my opinion that's a false positive. The newly added macros follow the 
same pattern as the existing ones.

Thanks,

- Felix

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ