lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c93f3b1d-3fc8-ee1c-7a7b-5d3d4562f5f9@seco.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:44:34 -0400
From:   Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: dpaa2-mac: Get serdes only for backplane
 links

On 3/22/23 19:10, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:52:23 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:
>> I see this is marked as "changes requested" on patchwork. However,
>> as explained above, I do not think that the requested changes are
>> necessary. Please review the patch status.
> 
> Let me document this, it keeps coming up. Patch incoming..

This is documented in the commit message. In fact, I got almost the same
response from Ioana the last time, made the same explanation, and
updated the commit message, but he did not respond to any further
emails. If I resend again, what will prevent that happening again? I am
doing my best to try and clarify this patch, but I am getting no
feedback. Nothing like "OK, Sean that makes sense to me, please put it
in the commit message" or "No, I don't think that's right because of
XYZ."

--Sean

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ