[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47bb2b55-2269-4c7b-9a21-e74f08277481@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:34:15 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 6/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: provide software
node for default settings
> To be clear, you're suggesting:
>
> if (!dsa_port_is_user(dp) && fwnode && ds->ops->port_get_fwnode) {
>
> ?
>
> If so, yes - you know better than I how these bits are supposed to work.
> Thanks.
Yes, that is what i was thinking.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists