[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1cb1f82-d5db-af2b-ceeb-956501abc639@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 05:19:33 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>,
habetsm.xilinx@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yalin Li <yalli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 4/4] sfc: remove expired unicast PTP filters
On 27/03/2023 11:57, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> Filters inserted to support unicast PTP mode might become unused after
> some time, so we need to remove them to avoid accumulating many of them.
>
> Refresh the expiration time of a filter each time it's used. Then check
> periodically if any filter hasn't been used for a long time (30s) and
> remove it.
>
> Reported-by: Yalin Li <yalli@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
> ---
...
> @@ -1378,8 +1394,12 @@ static int efx_ptp_insert_filter(struct efx_nic *efx,
> rxfilter->ether_type = spec->ether_type;
> rxfilter->loc_port = spec->loc_port;
> memcpy(rxfilter->loc_host, spec->loc_host, sizeof(spec->loc_host));
> + rxfilter->expiry = expiry;
> list_add(&rxfilter->list, filter_list);
>
> + queue_delayed_work(ptp->workwq, &ptp->cleanup_work,
> + UCAST_FILTER_EXPIRY_JIFFIES);
Why not +1 here...
> +static void efx_ptp_cleanup_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct efx_ptp_data *ptp =
> + container_of(work, struct efx_ptp_data, cleanup_work.work);
> + struct efx_ptp_rxfilter *rxfilter, *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(rxfilter, tmp, &ptp->rxfilters_ucast, list) {
> + if (time_is_before_jiffies(rxfilter->expiry))
> + efx_ptp_remove_one_filter(ptp->efx, rxfilter);
> + }
> +
> + if (!list_empty(&ptp->rxfilters_ucast)) {
> + queue_delayed_work(ptp->workwq, &ptp->cleanup_work,
> + UCAST_FILTER_EXPIRY_JIFFIES + 1);
> + }
... like you have here? (Or vice-versa.)
Other than that LGTM.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists