[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230328190155.7eab8368@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:01:55 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix tx throughput
regression with direct 1G links
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:04:04 +0100 Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Using the QDMA tx scheduler to throttle tx to line speed works fine for
> switch ports, but apparently caused a regression on non-switch ports.
>
> Based on a number of tests, it seems that this throttling can be safely
> dropped without re-introducing the issues on switch ports that the
> tx scheduling changes resolved.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/trinity-92c3826f-c2c8-40af-8339-bc6d0d3ffea4-1678213958520@3c-app-gmx-bs16/
> Fixes: f63959c7eec3 ("net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: implement multi-queue support for per-port queues")
> Reported-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> Reported-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> Tested-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
My reading of the discussion was that this patch is good, even if it
doesn't fix all the models, but it's marked as Changes Requested in PW.
Could you confirm that we should apply this one as is, just to be sure?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists