netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: clarify the need to sending reverts as patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230328190440.0f918125@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:04:40 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: clarify the need to sending
 reverts as patches

On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 12:19:14 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> I would write immutable instead of stable here to convey the idea that 
> there are no history rewrites once the tree is pushed out.

I'll s/stable/immutable/ when applying, thanks!