netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection fails since 6.2 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230329121232.7873ad95@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:12:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection
 fails since 6.2 kernel

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:48:36 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:40:44 +0200,
> Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:39:01PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:  
> > > Does openSUSE Tumbleweed make it easy to bisect the regression at least on
> > > “rc level”? It be great if narrow it more down, so we know it for example
> > > regressed in 6.2-rc7.
> > >   
> > 
> > Alternatively, can you do bisection using kernel sources from Linus's
> > tree (git required)?  
> 
> That'll be a last resort, if no one has idea at all :)

I had a quick look yesterday, there's only ~6 or so commits to e1000e.
Should be a fairly quick bisection, hopefully?

Adding Sasha.