netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] devlink: Add port function attributes to enable/disable IPsec crypto and packet offloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230329191147.GF831478@unreal>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:11:47 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dima Chumak <dchumak@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] devlink: Add port function attributes to
 enable/disable IPsec crypto and packet offloads

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:09:38AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:45:37 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:05:56AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:10:55 +0200 Dima Chumak wrote:  
> > > > Currently, mlx5 PCI VFs are disabled by default for IPsec functionality.
> > > > A user does not have the ability to enable IPsec support for a PCI VF
> > > > device.  
> > > 
> > > Could Mellanox/nVidia figure out a why to get folks trained on posting
> > > patches correctly? IDK how to do that exactly but you have a rather
> > > large employee base, it may be most efficient if you handle that
> > > internally than the community teaching people one by one.  
> > 
> > IDK why Dima postes like he posted, but we guide people and provide nice playground
> > to test submissions internally, but it is not enough. There are always nuances in
> > submission as rules constantly evolve.
> 
> I'd say that we try to improve the documentation these days more 
> than evolve the rules. The suggestion for how to post user space
> is 2.5 years old:
> 
> commit 6f7a1f9c1af30f1eadc0ad9e77ec8ee95c48b2c9
> Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Date:   Tue Nov 24 20:15:24 2020 -0800
> 
>     Documentation: netdev-FAQ: suggest how to post co-dependent series
> 
> > > Or perhaps there's something we can do to improve community docs?  
> > 
> > People don't read them :)
> 
> We can make them, but then we'll be the bad guys again :(

I don't have that we have other options given netdev ML volume but to be not nice.

Thanks