[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <943ee78c-e40a-4682-a271-65d40b69314f@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:01:42 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Buzarra, Arturo" <Arturo.Buzarra@...i.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: return EPROBE_DEFER if PHY is not accessible
> Regardless, what do you think reading 0x0000 or 0xFFFF should be
> considered as a PHY error?
It is clearly a hack to work around the missing clock. Sorry, but no.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists