netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/15] Introduce IDPF driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:03:09 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        shiraz.saleem@...el.com, emil.s.tantilov@...el.com,
        willemb@...gle.com, decot@...gle.com, joshua.a.hay@...el.com,
        sridhar.samudrala@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/15] Introduce IDPF driver

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 07:03:49AM -0700, Pavan Kumar Linga wrote:
> This patch series introduces the Infrastructure Data Path Function (IDPF)
> driver. It is used for both physical and virtual functions. Except for
> some of the device operations the rest of the functionality is the same
> for both PF and VF. IDPF uses virtchnl version2 opcodes and structures
> defined in the virtchnl2 header file which helps the driver to learn
> the capabilities and register offsets from the device Control Plane (CP)
> instead of assuming the default values.

Isn't IDPF currently being "standardized" at OASIS?

Has a standard been ratified? Isn't it rather premature to merge a
driver for a standard that doesn't exist?

Publicly posting pre-ratification work is often against the IP
policies of standards orgs, are you even legally OK to post this?

Confused,
Jason