[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCUon17pXpgBr0eQ@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:13:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove acpi.h implicit include of of.h
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:20:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> In the process of cleaning up DT includes, I found that some drivers
> using DT functions could build without any explicit DT include. I traced
> the include to be coming from acpi.h via irqdomain.h.
>
> I was pleasantly surprised that there were not 100s or even 10s of
> warnings when breaking the include chain. So here's the resulting
> series.
>
> I'd suggest Rafael take the whole series. Alternatively,the fixes can be
> applied in 6.4 and then the last patch either after rc1 or the
> following cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Nice cleanup, all are:
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists