netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Add NDOs for hardware timestamp get/set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 2 Apr 2023 08:28:08 -0600
From:   Max Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, kory.maincent@...tlin.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Add NDOs for hardware timestamp get/set

On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 2:18 PM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 12:24:50PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > It should be relatively easy to plumb both the ifr and the in-kernel
> > config thru all the DSA APIs and have it call the right helper, too,
> > tho? SMOC?
>
> Sorry, this does not compute.
>
> "Plumbing the in-kernel config thru all the DSA APIs" would be the
> netdev notifier that I proposed one year ago. I just need you to say
> "yes, sounds ok, let's see how that looks with last year's feedback
> addressed".

I sent out a second iteration of the ndo_hwtstamp_get/set patch.
I tried to address all the comments except fixing DSA API - I still
don't have a full understanding of what is the plan there.