[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC1A4r9TtR8VP3sr@hog>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:35:30 +0200
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] macsec: Add MACsec rx_handler change support
2023-03-29, 15:21:07 +0300, Emeel Hakim wrote:
> Offloading device drivers will mark offloaded MACsec SKBs with the
> corresponding SCI in the skb_metadata_dst so the macsec rx handler will
> know to which interface to divert those skbs, in case of a marked skb
> and a mismatch on the dst MAC address, divert the skb to the macsec
> net_device where the macsec rx_handler will be called.
Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here and in the
subject line.
To me, "Add MACsec rx_handler change support" sounds like you're
changing what function is used as ->rx_handler, which is not what this
patch is doing.
> Example of such a case is having a MACsec with VLAN as an inner header
> ETHERNET | SECTAG | VLAN packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/macsec.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
> index 25616247d7a5..88b00ea4af68 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
> @@ -1048,6 +1048,15 @@ static enum rx_handler_result handle_not_macsec(struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> __netif_rx(nskb);
> }
> +
> + if (md_dst && md_dst->type == METADATA_MACSEC &&
> + (find_rx_sc(&macsec->secy, md_dst->u.macsec_info.sci))) {
We already do that exact find_rx_sc call earlier in the same loop,
can't we skip it now?
> + skb->dev = ndev;
> + skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
> + ret = RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> continue;
> }
>
> --
> 2.21.3
>
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists