lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHApi-kjLp3WspBayU780aX7hLOu5GTkfqma7JAM3t74kU6MdA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 02:12:07 +0200 From: Kal Cutter Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com> To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>, Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: Fix unaligned descriptor validation > Since you already have a test case, it is better to submit them together such > that this case can be covered earlier than later. > > Other xskxceiver fixes have already landed to bpf-next. imo, I think for this > particular case, bpf-next for both the fix and the test is fine. Done. See: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230405235920.7305-1-kal.conley@dectris.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists