lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f1a32d5a-03e7-fce1-f5a5-6095f365f0a9@linux.dev> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:11:04 -0700 From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> To: Kal Cutter Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com> Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>, Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: Fix unaligned descriptor validation On 4/5/23 12:48 PM, Kal Cutter Conley wrote: >> Is this case covered by an existing test? >> > > No. I submitted a test but I was asked to make minor changes to it. I > plan to submit the test once this gets picked up on bpf-next. Since you already have a test case, it is better to submit them together such that this case can be covered earlier than later. Other xskxceiver fixes have already landed to bpf-next. imo, I think for this particular case, bpf-next for both the fix and the test is fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists