netdev - Re: [RESEND PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230406072504.68e032e6@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:25:04 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
Cc:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, hkallweit1@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@...opsys.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Looi Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@...el.com>,
        Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
        Lai Peter Jun Ann <peter.jun.ann.lai@...el.com>,
        Zulkifli Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
        Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...el.com>,
        hock.leong.kweh@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device
 before scanning for phy

On Thu,  6 Apr 2023 10:45:41 +0800 Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI.
> Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though
> there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached.
> 
> We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in
> fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to.

Why did you resend this?