lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8E023389-DDC8-48E4-99FC-94CAC9543788@intel.com> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:40:36 +0000 From: "Sit, Michael Wei Hong" <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> CC: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>, "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@...opsys.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, "Looi, Hong Aun" <hong.aun.looi@...el.com>, "Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>, "Lai, Peter Jun Ann" <peter.jun.ann.lai@...el.com>, "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>, "Tan, Tee Min" <tee.min.tan@...el.com>, "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy > On 6 Apr 2023, at 10:30 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:45:41 +0800 Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote: >> Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI. >> Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though >> there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached. >> >> We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in >> fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to. > > Why did you resend this? Fix a minor typo in commit message and also added the tags
Powered by blists - more mailing lists