netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add remove callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c4c3085-f7e3-443b-8dfe-4cc19e85d9ad@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:45:03 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>,
        hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add remove callback

> Andrew: my understanding is that a connected phy, maintains a reference
> to the relevant driver via phydev->mdio.dev.driver->owner, and such
> reference is dropped by phy_disconnect() via phy_detach().
> 
> So remove can invoked only after phy_disconnect
> 
> Does the above sounds reasonable/answer your question?

Yes, that does seem logical.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew