lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:12:54 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, gerhard@...leder-embedded.com, glipus@...il.com,
        kory.maincent@...tlin.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 2/5] net: Expose available time stamping
 layers to user space.

Am 2023-04-12 13:08, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:50:34PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> >> +/* Hardware layer of the SO_TIMESTAMPING provider */
>> >> +enum timestamping_layer {
>> >> +	SOF_MAC_TIMESTAMPING =3D (1<<0),
>> >> +	SOF_PHY_TIMESTAMPING =3D (1<<1),
>> >
>> > What does SOF_ stand for?
>> 
>> I'd guess start of frame. The timestamp will be taken at the
>> beginning of the frame.
> 
> I would suggest (with all due respect) that it was an inapt adaptation
> of the Socket Option Flags that can be seen in
> Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst.

Agreed. Noticing the other SOF_TIMESTAMPING_* names, your
suggestion makes way more sense. Sorry for the noise.

-michael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ