netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: propagate feature flags to vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZDbFPYBxejODjjDQ@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:50:37 +0200
From:   Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@...hat.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: propagate feature flags to vlan

On Apr 12 07:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:11:44 +0200 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Apr 11 15:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > stmmac_dev_probe doesn't propagate feature flags to VLANs.  So features
> > > like TX offloading don't correspond with the general features and it's
> > > not possible to manipulate features via ethtool -K to affect VLANs.  
> > 
> > On second thought, I wonder if this shouldn't go into net, rather then
> > net-next?  Does that make sense? And, do I have to re-submit, if so?
> 
> If it's not a regression it should go into net-next.
> "never worked, doesn't crash" category.

Ok, great, thanks!


Corinna