[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6438051c.050a0220.d7db1.e1f7@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:42:47 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 12/16] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: add LEDs
definition example
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:10:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Add LEDs definition example for qca8k Switch Family to describe how they
> > should be defined for a correct usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
> > index 389892592aac..ad354864187a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
> > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ description:
> > PHY it is connected to. In this config, an internal mdio-bus is registered and
> > the MDIO master is used for communication. Mixed external and internal
> > mdio-bus configurations are not supported by the hardware.
> > + Each phy has at most 3 LEDs connected and can be declared
> > + using the standard LEDs structure.
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
> > examples:
> > - |
> > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> >
> > mdio {
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > @@ -226,6 +229,27 @@ examples:
> > label = "lan1";
> > phy-mode = "internal";
> > phy-handle = <&internal_phy_port1>;
> > +
> > + leds {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + led@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_WHITE>;
> > + function = LED_FUNCTION_LAN;
> > + function-enumerator = <1>;
> > + default-state = "keep";
> > + };
> > +
> > + led@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_AMBER>;
> > + function = LED_FUNCTION_LAN;
> > + function-enumerator = <1>;
>
> Isn't function-enumerator supposed to be unique within a given
> 'function'?
>
In the following example the output would be:
- amber:lan-1
- white:lan-1
So in theory it's unique for the same color and function. Is it
acceptable? Seems sane that there may be multiple color for the same
function (and enum)
> > + default-state = "keep";
> > + };
> > + };
> > };
> >
> > port@2 {
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists