[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05cf9959-ff47-45b4-97a5-dd73042373fe@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:49:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 12/16] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: add LEDs
definition example
> > > examples:
> > > - |
> > > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > > + #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> > >
> > > mdio {
> > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > @@ -226,6 +229,27 @@ examples:
> > > label = "lan1";
> > > phy-mode = "internal";
> > > phy-handle = <&internal_phy_port1>;
> > > +
> > > + leds {
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + led@0 {
> > > + reg = <0>;
> > > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_WHITE>;
> > > + function = LED_FUNCTION_LAN;
> > > + function-enumerator = <1>;
> > > + default-state = "keep";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + led@1 {
> > > + reg = <1>;
> > > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_AMBER>;
> > > + function = LED_FUNCTION_LAN;
> > > + function-enumerator = <1>;
> >
> > Isn't function-enumerator supposed to be unique within a given
> > 'function'?
> >
>
> In the following example the output would be:
> - amber:lan-1
> - white:lan-1
>
> So in theory it's unique for the same color and function. Is it
> acceptable? Seems sane that there may be multiple color for the same
> function (and enum)
But what does the -1 actually mean?
At Pavel's request, i documented 'good' names for these LEDs. I
suggested that if there are multiple LEDs for one MAC/PHY, you use
something like 'left' or 'right' to indicate their position on the
RJ45 socket. That has a clear meaning.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists