netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] io_uring: Pass whole sqe to commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZDdvcSKLa6ZEAhRW@ovpn-8-18.pek2.redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:56:49 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc:     asml.silence@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, davem@...emloft.net,
        dccp@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, leit@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@...il.com,
        matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, ming.lei@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] io_uring: Pass whole sqe to commands

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:57:05AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Currently uring CMD operation relies on having large SQEs, but future
> operations might want to use normal SQE.
> 
> The io_uring_cmd currently only saves the payload (cmd) part of the SQE,
> but, for commands that use normal SQE size, it might be necessary to
> access the initial SQE fields outside of the payload/cmd block.  So,
> saves the whole SQE other than just the pdu.
> 
> This changes slighlty how the io_uring_cmd works, since the cmd
> structures and callbacks are not opaque to io_uring anymore. I.e, the
> callbacks can look at the SQE entries, not only, in the cmd structure.
> 
> The main advantage is that we don't need to create custom structures for
> simple commands.
> 
> Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> ---

...

> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> index 2e4c483075d3..9648134ccae1 100644
> --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> @@ -63,14 +63,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_done);
>  int io_uring_cmd_prep_async(struct io_kiocb *req)
>  {
>  	struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_uring_cmd);
> -	size_t cmd_size;
> +	size_t size = sizeof(struct io_uring_sqe);
>  
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(uring_cmd_pdu_size(0) != 16);
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(uring_cmd_pdu_size(1) != 80);
>  
> -	cmd_size = uring_cmd_pdu_size(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQE128);
> +	if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQE128)
> +		size <<= 1;
>  
> -	memcpy(req->async_data, ioucmd->cmd, cmd_size);
> +	memcpy(req->async_data, ioucmd->sqe, size);

The copy will make some fields of sqe become READ TWICE, and driver may see
different sqe field value compared with the one observed in io_init_req().

Can this kind of inconsistency cause trouble to driver?

If it isn't one problem, this patch looks fine.

But I guess any access on cmd->sqe in driver may have to be careful for dealing
with potential post-sqe-update.

Thanks,
Ming