[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412210816.072b5fe3@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 21:08:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
Cc: ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, edumazet@...gle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, linyunsheng@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] skbuff: Fix a race between coalescing and releasing
SKBs
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:26:40 +0800 Liang Chen wrote:
> /* In general, avoid mixing slab allocated and page_pool allocated
> - * pages within the same SKB. However when @to is not pp_recycle and
> - * @from is cloned, we can transition frag pages from page_pool to
> - * reference counted.
> - *
> - * On the other hand, don't allow coalescing two pp_recycle SKBs if
> - * @from is cloned, in case the SKB is using page_pool fragment
> - * references (PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG). Since we only take full page
> - * references for cloned SKBs at the moment that would result in
> - * inconsistent reference counts.
> + * pages within the same SKB. However don't allow coalescing two
The word 'however' no longer works here because there's no
contradiction, it's an additional rule.
> + * pp_recycle SKBs if @from is cloned, in case the SKB is using
> + * page_pool fragment references (PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG). Since we only
> + * take full page references for cloned SKBs at the moment that would
> + * result in inconsistent reference counts.
> */
> - if (to->pp_recycle != (from->pp_recycle && !skb_cloned(from)))
> + if (to->pp_recycle != from->pp_recycle ||
> + (from->pp_recycle && skb_cloned(from)))
How about we change the comment to:
/* In general, avoid mixing page_pool and non-page_pool allocated
* pages within the same SKB. Additionally avoid dealing with clones
* containing page_pool pages, in case the SKB is using page_pool fragment
* references (PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG). Since we only take full page
* references for cloned SKBs at the moment that would result in
* inconsistent reference counts.
* In theory we could take full references if from is cloned and
* !@to->pp_recycle but its tricky (due to potential race with the clone
* disappearing) and rare, so not worth dealing with.
*/
Please also add:
Fixes: 53e0961da1c7 ("page_pool: add frag page recycling support in page pool")
and Eric's review tag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists