netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: introduce xsk_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 10:15:49 +0800
From:   Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: introduce xsk_dma_ops

On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:57:53 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:56:10 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > May misunderstand, here the "dma_ops" is not the "dma_ops" of DMA API.
> > >
> > > I mean the callbacks for xsk to do dma.
> > >
> > > Maybe, I should rename it in the next version.
> >
> > Would you mind explaining this a bit more to folks like me who are not
> > familiar with VirtIO?  DMA API is supposed to hide the DMA mapping
> > details from the stack, why is it not sufficient here.
>
> Umm.. also it'd help to post the user of the API in the same series.
> I only see the XSK changes, maybe if the virtio changes were in
> the same series I could answer my own question.


This [1] is the similar code. This is the early version. But the idea is
similar to this patch.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20230202110058.130695-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com/


Thanks.