[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <IA1PR12MB6353EA08099A70A5CEE2E235AB629@IA1PR12MB6353.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:03:56 +0000
From: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"sd@...asysnail.net" <sd@...asysnail.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] net/mlx5: Support MACsec over VLAN
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 April 2023 3:36
> To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; pabeni@...hat.com; edumazet@...gle.com;
> sd@...asysnail.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; leon@...nel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] net/mlx5: Support MACsec over VLAN
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:31:00 +0300 Emeel Hakim wrote:
> > +static inline struct mlx5e_priv *macsec_netdev_priv(const struct
> > +net_device *dev)
>
> Does the compiler really not inline this without the explicit inline keyword?
I will remove it to let the compiler make its own decisions.
> > +{
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) ||
> defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)
>
> That's what IS_ENABLED() is for
ACK, I can replace it with #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q)
> > + if (is_vlan_dev(dev))
> > + return netdev_priv(vlan_dev_priv(dev)->real_dev);
> > +#endif
> > + return netdev_priv(dev);
> > +}
>
> --
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists