netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] bridge: Add per-{Port, VLAN} neighbor suppression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZEAC6y6vIL37Gk2Q@shredder>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:04:11 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        roopa@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] bridge: Add per-{Port, VLAN} neighbor
 suppression

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > > For the set:
> > > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
> > 
> > Thanks! Will rebase, retest and submit v1
> 
> Shouldn't the version numbers be independent of the RFC/PATCH
> designation (and thus this would be a v2)? I know I was extremely
> confused when I had to review a series by Colin Foster which jumped back
> and forth between PATCH v6, RFC v3, PATCH v7, etc.

Makes sense. Will mark it v2