netdev - Re: [PATCHv5 net-next] bonding: add software tx timestamping support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24846.1681879456@famine>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:44:16 -0700
From:   Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Liang Li <liali@...hat.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next] bonding: add software tx timestamping support

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

>On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:09:17 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
>> > I'll apply Jay's ack from v4 since these are not substantial changes.
>> > Thanks!  
>> 
>> Sorry, not sure if I missed something. bond_ethtool_get_ts_info() could be
>> called without RTNL. And we have ASSERT_RTNL() in v4.
>
>Are there any documented best practices on when to keep an ack?
>I'm not aware of such a doc, it's a bit of a gray zone.
>IMHO the changes here weren't big enough to drop Jay's tag.

	I don't know of any such documents, but just to clarify for
posterity, I'm fine with having my ack on the patch.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com