[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230420-absinthe-broiler-b992997c6cc5@wendy>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 08:18:35 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
<daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>, <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
<claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] net: macb: Shorten max_tx_len to 4KiB - 56 on mpfs
Jaukb, Simon,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 06:02:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:28:25 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
[readding the context]
> > > static const struct macb_config sama7g5_gem_config = {
> > > @@ -4986,8 +4985,17 @@ static int macb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > bp->tx_clk = tx_clk;
> > > bp->rx_clk = rx_clk;
> > > bp->tsu_clk = tsu_clk;
> > > - if (macb_config)
> > > + if (macb_config) {
> > > + if (hw_is_gem(bp->regs, bp->native_io)) {
> > > + if (macb_config->max_tx_length)
> > > + bp->max_tx_length = macb_config->max_tx_length;
> > > + else
> > > + bp->max_tx_length = GEM_MAX_TX_LEN;
> > > + } else {
> > > + bp->max_tx_length = MACB_MAX_TX_LEN;
> > > + }
> > no need to refresh the patch on my account.
> > But can the above be simplified as:
> >
> > if (macb_is_gem(bp) && hw_is_gem(bp->regs, bp->native_io))
> > bp->max_tx_length = macb_config->max_tx_length;
> > else
> > bp->max_tx_length = MACB_MAX_TX_LEN;
>
> I suspect that DaveM agreed, because patch is set to Changes Requested
> in patchwork :)
>
> Daire, please respin with Simon's suggestion.
I'm feeling a bit stupid reading this suggestion as I am not sure how it
is supposed to work :(
Firstly, why macb_is_gem() and hw_is_gem()? They both do the same thing,
except last time around we established that macb_is_gem() cannot return
anything other than false at this point.
What have I missed here?
Secondly, is it guaranteed that macb_config::max_tx_length is even
set?
Also, another question...
Is it even possible for `if (macb_config)` to be false?
Isn't it either going to be set to &default_gem_config or to
match->data, no? The driver is pretty inconsistent about if it checks
whether macb_config is non-NULL before accessing it, but from reading
.probe, it seems to be like it is always set to something valid at this
point.
(btw Daire, Nicolas' email has no h in it)
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists