netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] Add NDOs for hardware timestamp get/set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:03:44 +0200
From:   Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To:     Max Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com,
        vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, richardcochran@...il.com,
        gerhard@...leder-embedded.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] Add NDOs for hardware timestamp get/set

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:04:06 -0600
Max Georgiev <glipus@...il.com> wrote:

> I've updated the patches in the stack based on the feedback you folks
> kindly shared
> for v3. I'm currently testing the combination of the changes in
> dev_ioctl.c and netdevsim
> driver changes - almost done with that. Let me finish this testing,
> then update the patch
> descriptions, and I'll be ready to send it out for review.
> 
> Regarding e1000e conversion patch: I don't have access to any NICs
> with hw timestamping
> support. I was going to drop the e1000e patch from v4 unless someone
> volunteered to test it on real hardware. But that will have to wait till the
> rest of the stack is reviewed and
> at least preliminary accepted, right?

Great, thanks for the status.
Indeed, if no one raise its hand to test the e1000e conversion you can drop it.