[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fddf3dd3-2d75-3969-7a62-a4eeeb6ef553@engleder-embedded.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:02:56 +0200
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
bjorn@...nel.org, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] tsnep: Add XDP socket zero-copy TX
support
On 20.04.23 22:17, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:04:59PM +0200, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
>> Send and complete XSK pool frames within TX NAPI context. NAPI context
>> is triggered by ndo_xsk_wakeup.
>>
>> Test results with A53 1.2GHz:
>>
>> xdpsock txonly copy mode:
>> pps pkts 1.00
>> tx 284,409 11,398,144
>> Two CPUs with 100% and 10% utilization.
>>
>> xdpsock txonly zero-copy mode:
>> pps pkts 1.00
>> tx 511,929 5,890,368
>> Two CPUs with 100% and 1% utilization.
>
> Hmm, I think l2fwd ZC numbers should be included here not in the previous
> patch?
Will be done.
>>
>> Packet rate increases and CPU utilization is reduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h | 2 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
(...)
>> static bool tsnep_tx_poll(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int napi_budget)
>> {
>> struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
>> struct netdev_queue *nq;
>> + int xsk_frames = 0;
>> int budget = 128;
>> int length;
>> int count;
>> @@ -676,7 +771,7 @@ static bool tsnep_tx_poll(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int napi_budget)
>> if ((entry->type & TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB) &&
>> skb_shinfo(entry->skb)->nr_frags > 0)
>> count += skb_shinfo(entry->skb)->nr_frags;
>> - else if (!(entry->type & TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB) &&
>> + else if ((entry->type & TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP) &&
>> xdp_frame_has_frags(entry->xdpf))
>> count += xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(entry->xdpf)->nr_frags;
>>
>> @@ -705,9 +800,11 @@ static bool tsnep_tx_poll(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int napi_budget)
>>
>> if (entry->type & TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB)
>> napi_consume_skb(entry->skb, napi_budget);
>> - else
>> + else if (entry->type & TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP)
>> xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(entry->xdpf);
>> - /* xdpf is union with skb */
>> + else
>> + xsk_frames++;
>> + /* xdpf and zc are union with skb */
>> entry->skb = NULL;
>>
>> tx->read = (tx->read + count) & TSNEP_RING_MASK;
>> @@ -718,6 +815,14 @@ static bool tsnep_tx_poll(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int napi_budget)
>> budget--;
>> } while (likely(budget));
>>
>> + if (tx->xsk_pool) {
>> + if (xsk_frames)
>> + xsk_tx_completed(tx->xsk_pool, xsk_frames);
>> + if (xsk_uses_need_wakeup(tx->xsk_pool))
>> + xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(tx->xsk_pool);
>> + tsnep_xdp_xmit_zc(tx);
>
> would be good to signal to NAPI if we are done with the work or is there a
> need to be rescheduled (when you didn't manage to consume all of the descs
> from XSK Tx ring).
In my opinion this is already done. If some budget is left, then we are
done and tsnep_tx_poll() returns true to signal work is complete. If
buget gets zero, then tsnep_tx_poll() returns false to signal work is
not complete. This return value is considered for the NAPI signaling
by tsnep_poll().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists