netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 00/10] Add tc-mqprio and tc-taprio support for preemptible traffic classes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230422165945.7df2xbpeg3llgt7x@skbuf>
Date:   Sat, 22 Apr 2023 19:59:45 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 00/10] Add tc-mqprio and tc-taprio
 support for preemptible traffic classes

On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:14:01AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> Thanks for updating the man pages. These should go through main first; I
> can sync to main after those are applied and before your set if needed.
> 
> ... and updated headers.
> 
> Repost the patches as 2 sets with the man page fixes targeted at main
> and the new preemptible work for -next.

So the status is as follows: patches 01-06 apply cleanly to the current
iproute2/main, and after another iproute2 -> iproute2-next merge, patch
07 can be skipped and patches 08-10 also apply cleanly to the resulting
iproute2-next branch.

Unless there are changes I need to make to the contents of the patches,
could you take these from the lists, or is that a no-no?