[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce193e89-0e20-4d9d-bdf5-e5151bee88e1@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:45:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: drop PHYLIB_LEDS knob
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 03:01:11PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 22:44:34 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, at 22:38, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >>
> > >> -config PHYLIB_LEDS
> > >> - bool "Support probing LEDs from device tree"
> > >
> > > I don't know Kconfig to well, but i think you just need to remove the
> > > text, just keep the bool.
> > >
> > > - bool "Support probing LEDs from device tree"
> > > + bool
> >
> > Right, that should work, or it can become
> >
> > def_bool y
> >
> > or even
> >
> > def_bool OF
> >
> > for brevity.
>
> Hm, I think Paolo was concerned that we'd get PHYLIB_LEDS=y if PHYLIB=n
> and LEDS_CLASS=n. But that's not possible because the option is in the
> "if PHYLIB" section.
>
> Is that right?
Seems correct to me.
But a randconfig test bot is who you really want conformation from.
The bot is probably harder to keep happy then Linus.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists