[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEdmdDAwnuslrdvA@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:34:44 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: Ensure consistent address families when
resolving templates
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:23:02PM +0200, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> xfrm_state_find() uses `encap_family` of the current template with
> the passed local and remote addresses to find a matching state.
> This check makes sure that there is no mismatch and out-of-bounds
> read in mixed-family scenarios where optional tunnel or BEET mode
> templates were skipped that would have changed the addresses to
> match the current template's family.
>
> This basically enforces the same check as validate_tmpl(), just at
> runtime when one or more optional templates might have been skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
I'm confused. By skipping, you're presumably referring to IPcomp.
For IPcomp, skipping should only occur on inbound, but your patch
is changing a code path that's only invoked for outbound. What's
going on?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists