[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e05d4d4d33a2c50973d139752b4fcfad5dbdf056.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 09:07:34 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wifi: ath11k: Use list_count_nodes()
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 07:35 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> writes:
>
> > ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_vdevs() and ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_bcn() really
> > look the same as list_count_nodes(), so use the latter instead of hand
> > writing it.
> >
> > The first ones use list_for_each_entry() and the other list_for_each(), but
> > they both count the number of nodes in the list.
> >
> > While at it, also remove to prototypes of non-existent functions.
> > Based on the names and prototypes, it is likely that they should be
> > equivalent to list_count_nodes().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> > ---
> > Un-tested
>
> I'll run sanity tests on ath11k patches. I'll also add "Compile tested
> only" to the commit log.
>
> Oh, and ath11k patches go to ath tree, not net-next.
Just for awareness, there are 2 additional patches apparently targeting
net-next but being instead for the WiFi tree:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e77ed7f719787cb8836a93b6a6972f4147e40bc6.1682537509.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e6ec525c0c5057e97e33a63f8a4aa482e5c2da7f.1682541872.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists