[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <667f3a20-aaa3-edd6-8769-7096649c5737@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:08:27 -0700
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.4
On 4/28/23 1:57 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Stats for 6.4 are here!
Thanks, Jakub, it is always interesting to see an overview of what's
been happening.
[...]
>
> Top scores (positive): Top scores (negative):
[...]
>
> The positive participation scores reflect the reviewer activity.
[...]
> On the "bad" side the only constants are
[...]
Can you give a little more description of what is being measured in this
section - is this reviews versus submissions? And what are some ways
for a company to get out of the wrong list?
>
> Histograms!
> -----------
>
> I was wondering about the distribution of "tenure" in the community.
> Are we relying on "old timers" to review the code? Are the "old timers"
> still coding? Do we have any new participants at all?
Is this relying on the .mailmap for finding longevity? I probably need
to add a couple more entries here.
Thanks!
sln
Powered by blists - more mailing lists