netdev - Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d47c418-32d9-4d6a-9510-a6a927ebe61b@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sat, 29 Apr 2023 00:51:52 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.4

> Can you give a little more description of what is being measured in this
> section - is this reviews versus submissions?  And what are some ways for a
> company to get out of the wrong list?

Good citizens should perform code reviews as well as submit code. So
yes, it is reviews versus submissions. If you look at previous
versions of this report there is more details about the calculation.

Microchip has done exactly that, gone from the bad side to the good
side. And they did it by a couple of their engineers performing
reviews.

	Andrew