[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f50c3e4-f377-3adf-e4ba-35c323d0a50e@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 12:53:07 -0400
From: Feng Liu <feliu@...dia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
William Tu <witu@...dia.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 2/2] virtio_net: Close queue pairs using helper
function
On 2023-05-01 a.m.10:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 09:58:18AM -0400, Feng Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023-05-01 a.m.8:44, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 06:43:46PM -0400, Feng Liu wrote:
>>>> Use newly introduced helper function that exactly does the same of
>>>> closing the queue pairs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <feliu@...dia.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@...dia.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> I guess this was put in a separate patch to 1/2, as it's more
>>> net-next material, as opposed to 1/2 which seems to be net material.
>>> FWIIW, I'd lean to putting 1/2 in net. And holding this one for net-next.
>>>
>>> That aside, this looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
>>
>> Will do, thanks Simon
>
> Nah, I think you should just squash these two patches together.
> It's early in the merge window.
>
> --
> MST
>
OK, will do , thx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists