[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFCm4ajSNCMxRN29@corigine.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 08:00:01 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Feng Liu <feliu@...dia.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
William Tu <witu@...dia.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 2/2] virtio_net: Close queue pairs using helper
function
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:14:00AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 09:58:18AM -0400, Feng Liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2023-05-01 a.m.8:44, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 06:43:46PM -0400, Feng Liu wrote:
> > > > Use newly introduced helper function that exactly does the same of
> > > > closing the queue pairs.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <feliu@...dia.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@...dia.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
> > >
> > > I guess this was put in a separate patch to 1/2, as it's more
> > > net-next material, as opposed to 1/2 which seems to be net material.
> > > FWIIW, I'd lean to putting 1/2 in net. And holding this one for net-next.
> > >
> > > That aside, this looks good to me.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> >
> > Will do, thanks Simon
>
> Nah, I think you should just squash these two patches together.
> It's early in the merge window.
Ack, sorry for the noise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists