[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFAEtI+UgPWGbJMH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 21:28:04 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, linux@...linux.org.uk,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, olteanv@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] i2c: designware: Add driver support for
Wangxun 10Gb NIC
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:08:59PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > #define MODEL_MSCC_OCELOT BIT(8)
> > > #define MODEL_BAIKAL_BT1 BIT(9)
> > > #define MODEL_AMD_NAVI_GPU BIT(10)
> > > +#define MODEL_WANGXUN_SP BIT(11)
> > > #define MODEL_MASK GENMASK(11, 8)
> >
> > Yeah, maybe next one will need to transform this from bitfield to plain number.
>
> You mean this?
No, only MODEL_XXX bits.
> -#define ACCESS_INTR_MASK BIT(0)
> -#define ACCESS_NO_IRQ_SUSPEND BIT(1)
> -#define ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE BIT(2)
> -
> -#define MODEL_MSCC_OCELOT BIT(8)
> -#define MODEL_BAIKAL_BT1 BIT(9)
> -#define MODEL_AMD_NAVI_GPU BIT(10)
> -#define MODEL_MASK GENMASK(11, 8)
> +#define ACCESS_INTR_MASK 0x00
> +#define ACCESS_NO_IRQ_SUSPEND 0x01
> +#define ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE 0x02
> +
> +#define MODEL_MSCC_OCELOT 0x08
> +#define MODEL_BAIKAL_BT1 0x09
> +#define MODEL_AMD_NAVI_GPU 0x0a
> +#define MODEL_MASK 0x78
>
> I actually like more bitfield to plain numbers.
Too limited. For model we get 16 out of 4 bits, which is much better and as you
see we have a trend.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists